getting diagram of initial state
getting diagram of goal state
Expanding nodes at depth 0
Expanding state 0
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 1
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 1
successfully verified the action of new state 1 with the path: The action `move_two(straight0, f0-1f, f1-1f, f2-1f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action logically moves us closer to the goal by clearing a position in the top row. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are all accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 2
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: 
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 2 is invalid: 
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 3
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 3
successfully verified the action of new state 3 with the path: The last action `move_l_down(rightl0, f2-2f, f3-2f, f3-3f, f4-2f, f4-3f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action logically progresses towards the goal state by clearing the top rows. The natural language description and visualization accurately represent the current state.
Number of valid nodes at depth 1 (2) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 1
Expanding state 1
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 4
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f2-2f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 4 is invalid: Precondition violation: f2-2f is not clear.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 5
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 5
successfully verified the action of new state 5 with the path: The last action `move_square(square1, f2-0f, f3-0f)` is valid as all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly applied. The current state's natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization accurately reflect the sequence of actions taken. The action logically progresses towards the goal state by moving pieces downwards to clear the top rows.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 6
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f2-2f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 6 is invalid: Precondition violation: f2-2f is not clear.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 7
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violated: f2-0f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 7 is invalid: Precondition violated: f2-0f is not clear.
Expanding state 3
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 8
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 8
successfully verified the action of new state 8 with the path: The last action `move_square(square1, f2-0f, f3-0f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied: f3-0f was clear, square1 occupied f2-0f, and f2-0f and f3-0f are adjacent. The effects are correctly updated in the current state, with f2-0f clear and f3-0f occupied by square1. The current state's description and visualization accurately reflect the sequence of actions taken, and all objects from the initial state are present. The action helps progress towards the goal state by clearing a position in the top three rows.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 9
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 9
successfully verified the action of new state 9 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight0, f0-1f, f1-1f, f2-1f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied in the parent state, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The current state's description and visualization accurately reflect the sequence of actions taken, and all objects from the initial state are present. The action moves us closer to the goal state by clearing positions in the top rows.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 3th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 10
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at position f2-0f.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square1 position is incorrect in the child state encoding.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square1 incorrectly occupies f2-0f, which should be clear.
[Attempt 4] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square1 is incorrectly listed as occupying f1-0f instead of f2-0f.
[Attempt 5] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f2-0f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 10 is invalid: Precondition violation: f2-0f is not clear.
Number of valid nodes at depth 2 (3) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 2
Expanding state 5
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 11
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violated: f2-2f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 11 is invalid: Precondition violated: f2-2f is not clear.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 12
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 12
successfully verified the action of new state 12 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight1, f0-2f, f1-2f, f2-3f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization accurately represent the current state, and the action logically progresses towards the goal state.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 13
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f2-2f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 13 is invalid: Precondition violation: f2-2f is not clear.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 14
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: The "rightl0" piece overlaps with "straight1" in position f2-2f, violating the non-overlapping constraint.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violated: f2-2f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 14 is invalid: Precondition violated: f2-2f is not clear.
Expanding state 8
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 15
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 15
successfully verified the action of new state 15 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight0, f0-1f, f1-1f, f2-1f)` is valid as all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The current state's description and visualization accurately represent the state after the sequence of actions. The action moves a piece closer to the lower rows, aligning with the goal of clearing the top three rows.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 16
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 16
successfully verified the action of new state 16 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight1, f0-2f, f1-2f, f2-2f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied in the parent state, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The current state's description and visualization accurately reflect the sequence of actions taken, and all objects from the initial state are present. The action logically progresses towards the goal state by moving pieces out of the top three rows.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 3th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 17
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 17
successfully verified the action of new state 17 with the path: The last action `move_square(square0, f1-0f, f2-0f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The current state's description and visualization accurately represent the state after the sequence of actions, and the action logically progresses towards the goal state by moving a piece out of the top three rows.
Expanding state 9
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 18
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 18
successfully verified the action of new state 18 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight1, f0-2f, f1-2f, f2-2f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The current state's description and visualization accurately represent the state after the sequence of actions taken from the initial state.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 19
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 cannot occupy the same position f2-0f.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: Overlap of square0 and square1 at position f2-0f.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: Overlap between square0 and square1 at position f2-0f.
[Attempt 4] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: Overlap of square0 and square1 at position f2-0f.
[Attempt 5] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f2-0f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 19 is invalid: Precondition violation: f2-0f is not clear.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 20
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f2-1f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 20 is invalid: Precondition violation: f2-1f is not clear.
Number of valid nodes at depth 3 (5) exceeds beam width (4) -> ranking...
Expanding nodes at depth 3
Expanding state 18
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 21
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Positions f1-0f and f2-3f are not adjacent, violating the precondition.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 21 is invalid: Positions f1-0f and f2-3f are not adjacent, violating the precondition.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 22
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Action does not align with goal state's requirement to clear f1-1f.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 22 is invalid: Action does not align with goal state's requirement to clear f1-1f.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 23
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition of adjacency is violated; f1-0f and f3-0f are not adjacent.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 23 is invalid: Precondition of adjacency is violated; f1-0f and f3-0f are not adjacent.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 24
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 24
successfully verified the action of new state 24 with the path: The last action `move_l_down(rightl0, f3-2f, f4-2f, f4-3f, f5-2f, f5-3f)` is valid as all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization accurately reflect the state after the sequence of actions. The action logically moves the pieces closer to the goal state of clearing the top three rows.
Expanding state 15
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 25
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 25
successfully verified the action of new state 25 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight1, f0-2f, f1-2f, f2-2f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly applied in the current state. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate, reflecting the sequence of actions taken from the initial state. The action logically progresses towards the goal state by clearing the top rows.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 26
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 26
successfully verified the action of new state 26 with the path: The last action `move_square(square0, f1-0f, f2-0f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization accurately reflect the state after the sequence of actions. The action also aligns with the goal of clearing the top three rows.
Expanding state 17
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 27
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 27
successfully verified the action of new state 27 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight0, f0-1f, f1-1f, f2-1f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The action logically moves us closer to the goal state by clearing the top rows. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 28
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 28
successfully verified the action of new state 28 with the path: The action `move_two(straight1, f0-2f, f1-2f, f2-2f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly applied in the current state. The action logically progresses towards the goal state by clearing the top row. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Expanding state 12
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 29
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 29
successfully verified the action of new state 29 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight0, f1-1f, f2-1f, f3-1f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly applied in the current state. The action helps move towards the goal state by clearing part of row 1. The natural language description and visualization of the current state accurately reflect the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 30
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 30
successfully verified the action of new state 30 with the path: The last action `move_square(square0, f1-0f, f2-0f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action logically progresses towards the goal state by clearing the top rows. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 4 (7) exceeds beam width (4) -> ranking...
Expanding nodes at depth 4
Expanding state 24
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 31
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at position f2-0f.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 is incorrectly listed at f1-0f instead of f2-0f, causing overlap with square1.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at f2-0f, violating constraints.
[Attempt 4] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at position f2-0f.
[Attempt 5] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violated: f2-0f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 31 is invalid: Precondition violated: f2-0f is not clear.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 32
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 32
State 32 failed the action path verification test: The last action `move_square(square0, f1-0f, f0-0f)` is valid in terms of preconditions and effects, but it is not logical for achieving the goal state, as it moves a piece into the top row, which needs to be cleared. The current state's natural language description and visualization are accurate.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 33
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at f2-0f, which is not allowed.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: Overlap between square0 and square1 at position f2-0f.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at position f2-0f.
[Attempt 4] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 is incorrectly listed as occupying f2-0f instead of f1-0f.
[Attempt 5] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f2-0f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 33 is invalid: Precondition violation: f2-0f is not clear.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 34
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: f1-0f and f2-3f are not adjacent.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 34 is invalid: f1-0f and f2-3f are not adjacent.
Expanding state 25
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 35
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 35
successfully verified the action of new state 35 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight0, f1-1f, f2-1f, f3-1f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action logically moves the piece closer to the goal state by clearing a position in the top three rows. The current state's natural language description and visualization accurately represent the effects of the actions taken from the initial state.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 36
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 36
successfully verified the action of new state 36 with the path: The last action `move_l_down(rightl0, f3-2f, f4-2f, f4-3f, f5-2f, f5-3f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied in the parent state, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action helps progress towards the goal state by clearing row 3. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 3th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 37
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 37
successfully verified the action of new state 37 with the path: The last action `move_square(square0, f1-0f, f2-0f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The current state's description and visualization accurately represent the state after the sequence of actions, and the state is closer to the goal of clearing the top three rows.
Expanding state 26
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 38
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 38
successfully verified the action of new state 38 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight1, f0-2f, f1-2f, f2-2f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken. The action logically progresses towards the goal state by clearing the top rows.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Expanding state 27
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 39
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 39
successfully verified the action of new state 39 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight1, f0-2f, f1-2f, f2-2f)` is valid as all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The current state's description and visualization accurately reflect the sequence of actions taken, and the action logically progresses towards the goal state.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 40
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 40
successfully verified the action of new state 40 with the path: The last action `move_l_down(rightl0, f3-2f, f4-2f, f4-3f, f5-2f, f5-3f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action logically moves the piece closer to achieving the goal state by clearing the top rows. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
Number of valid nodes at depth 5 (6) exceeds beam width (4) -> ranking...
Expanding nodes at depth 5
Expanding state 35
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 41
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f3-2f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 41 is invalid: Precondition violation: f3-2f is not clear.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 42
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f3-2f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 42 is invalid: Precondition violation: f3-2f is not clear.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 43
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Non-adjacent positions for move_two action.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 43 is invalid: Non-adjacent positions for move_two action.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 44
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 44
successfully verified the action of new state 44 with the path: The action `move_two(straight1, f1-2f, f2-2f, f2-3f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied in the parent state, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action moves the piece further down, aligning with the goal of clearing the top rows. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
Expanding state 39
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 45
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 45
successfully verified the action of new state 45 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight0, f1-1f, f2-1f, f3-1f)` is valid as all preconditions are met in the parent state, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The action helps in achieving the goal state by moving pieces down, clearing the top rows. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 46
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 46
successfully verified the action of new state 46 with the path: The last action `move_square(square0, f2-0f, f3-1f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The action logically moves towards the goal state by clearing a position in the top rows. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are all accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
Expanding state 36
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 47
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 47
State 47 failed the action path verification test: The last action is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly applied. However, the current state's natural language description and visualization are inaccurate regarding the position of straight0, which should be in f2-1f and f3-1f, not f3-1f and f4-1f.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 48
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 48
successfully verified the action of new state 48 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight0, f1-1f, f2-1f, f3-1f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action logically moves the piece closer to the goal state by clearing part of the top rows. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 49
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 49
successfully verified the action of new state 49 with the path: The last action `move_square(square0, f1-0f, f2-0f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied in the parent state, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The action helps achieve the goal by clearing a position in the top three rows. The current state's description and visualization accurately reflect the sequence of actions taken from the initial state.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Expanding state 37
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 50
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: The status of the grid cells affected by the move_two action is not correctly updated in the child state encoding.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 50
successfully verified the action of new state 50 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight0, f1-1f, f2-1f, f3-1f)` is valid as all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The action logically moves the piece closer to the goal state by clearing the top rows. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are all accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 51
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 51
successfully verified the action of new state 51 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight0, f1-1f, f2-1f, f3-1f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action logically moves the piece closer to the goal state by clearing the top rows. The current state's description and visualization accurately represent the effects of the actions taken from the initial state.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 3th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 52
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 52
successfully verified the action of new state 52 with the path: The last action `move_l_down(rightl0, f3-2f, f4-2f, f4-3f, f5-2f, f5-3f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are consistent and accurate, with all objects from the initial state present and correctly positioned.
Number of valid nodes at depth 6 (8) exceeds beam width (4) -> ranking...
Expanding nodes at depth 6
Expanding state 44
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 53
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 53
successfully verified the action of new state 53 with the path: The last action `move_square(square0, f1-0f, f2-0f)` is valid as all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly applied in the current state. The current state's description and visualization accurately reflect the sequence of actions taken, and the action contributes to achieving the goal state by clearing a position in the top rows.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 54
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 54
successfully verified the action of new state 54 with the path: The last action `move_square(square0, f1-0f, f1-1f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly applied in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization accurately reflect the current state, and the action aligns with the goal of clearing the top three rows.
Expanding state 45
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 55
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 55
successfully verified the action of new state 55 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight1, f2-2f, f3-2f, f4-2f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are consistent and accurate with the sequence of actions taken. The action logically progresses towards the goal state by clearing the top rows.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 56
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 56
successfully verified the action of new state 56 with the path: The last action `move_l_down(rightl0, f3-2f, f4-2f, f4-3f, f5-2f, f5-3f)` is valid as all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly applied. The current state's natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization accurately reflect the sequence of actions taken and the goal state requirements. All objects from the initial state are present and correctly visualized in the current state.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Expanding state 46
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 57
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violated: f3-1f is not clear for `straight0` to move.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 57 is invalid: Precondition violated: f3-1f is not clear for `straight0` to move.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 58
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 58
successfully verified the action of new state 58 with the path: The last action `move_square(square0, f3-1f, f4-0f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied: f4-0f is clear, square0 occupies f3-1f, and the positions are adjacent. The effects are correctly updated in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization accurately reflect the state after the sequence of actions. The action logically moves towards the goal of clearing the top three rows.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 59
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f3-0f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 59 is invalid: Precondition violation: f3-0f is not clear.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 60
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 incorrectly occupy the same position f3-0f.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 position overlaps with square1 in the child state.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0's position overlaps with square1 in the child state.
[Attempt 4] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 overlaps with square1 in the child state.
[Attempt 5] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f3-1f is not clear for `move_two` action.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 60 is invalid: Precondition violation: f3-1f is not clear for `move_two` action.
Expanding state 48
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 61
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 61
successfully verified the action of new state 61 with the path: The last action is valid because all preconditions are satisfied: `f3-2f` was clear, `straight1` occupied `f1-2f` and `f2-2f`, and `f2-2f` and `f3-2f` are adjacent. The current state's description and visualization accurately reflect the effects of the action and the sequence of actions taken from the initial state.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 62
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: 
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 62 is invalid: 
Number of valid nodes at depth 7 (6) exceeds beam width (4) -> ranking...
Expanding nodes at depth 7
Expanding state 55
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 63
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 63
successfully verified the action of new state 63 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight0, f2-1f, f3-1f, f4-1f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate, and the action logically progresses towards the goal state.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 64
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 64
successfully verified the action of new state 64 with the path: The last action `(move_two(straight1, f3-2f, f4-2f, f5-2f))` is valid because all preconditions are met in the parent state, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action logically moves the piece closer to the goal state by clearing the top rows. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 3th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 65
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: Overlap error: square0 and square1 both occupy f3-0f.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at f3-0f.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square1 is incorrectly positioned at f2-0f instead of f3-0f.
[Attempt 4] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at f3-0f.
[Attempt 5] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f3-0f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 65 is invalid: Precondition violation: f3-0f is not clear.
Expanding state 61
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 66
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 66
State 66 failed the action path verification test: The last action `move_square(square0, f1-0f, f2-0f)` is invalid because the precondition that f2-0f must be clear is not satisfied; it is occupied by `square1` in the parent state. Consequently, the current state's description and visualization are based on an invalid action.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 67
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 67
successfully verified the action of new state 67 with the path: The last action `move_square(square0, f1-0f, f2-0f)` is valid because all preconditions are met: f2-0f is clear, square0 occupies f1-0f, and f1-0f and f2-0f are adjacent. The effects are correctly reflected in the current state, and the action logically progresses towards the goal state. The current state's natural language description and visualization are accurate, with all initial pieces present and correctly positioned.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Expanding state 53
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 68
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 68
successfully verified the action of new state 68 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight1, f2-2f, f2-3f, f3-3f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied in the parent state, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The current state's description and visualization accurately represent the state after the sequence of actions taken from the initial state. The action logically progresses towards the goal state by moving pieces out of the top three rows.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Expanding state 54
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 69
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 69
State 69 failed the action path verification test: The last action `move_two(straight1, f2-2f, f2-3f, f3-3f)` is invalid because the current state does not reflect the correct positions of straight1 after the move. The preconditions are met, but the effects are not correctly updated in the current state's description and visualization. Specifically, straight1 should occupy f2-3f and f3-3f, and f2-2f should be clear, which is not shown in the current state.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 70
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 70
successfully verified the action of new state 70 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight1, f2-2f, f2-3f, f3-3f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied in the parent state, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The current state's natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization accurately reflect the sequence of actions taken. The action logically progresses towards the goal state by moving pieces out of the top three rows.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 71
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 71
successfully verified the action of new state 71 with the path: The last action `move_square(square0, f1-1f, f2-1f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The current state's natural language description and visualization accurately represent the state after the sequence of actions. The action logically moves towards the goal of clearing the top three rows.
Number of valid nodes at depth 8 (6) exceeds beam width (4) -> ranking...
Expanding nodes at depth 8
Expanding state 63
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 72
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: Overlap of square0 and square1 at f3-0f is not allowed.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: Overlap between square0 and square1 at position f3-0f.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 overlaps with square1 in the child state.
[Attempt 4] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: Overlap of square0 and square1 at position f3-0f.
[Attempt 5] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violated: f3-0f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 72 is invalid: Precondition violated: f3-0f is not clear.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 73
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 73
successfully verified the action of new state 73 with the path: The last action `move_square(square0, f2-0f, f3-1f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken. The action logically moves the piece closer to achieving the goal state by clearing the top rows.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 74
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at position f3-0f.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square1 overlaps with square0 in the child state.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: Overlap of square0 and square1 at f3-0f.
[Attempt 4] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square1 overlaps with square0 in the child state.
[Attempt 5] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Destination position is not clear; visualization error with overlapping pieces.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 74 is invalid: Destination position is not clear; visualization error with overlapping pieces.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 75
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 75
successfully verified the action of new state 75 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight0, f4-1f, f5-1f, f5-2f)` is valid as all preconditions are satisfied in the parent state, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The current state's natural language description and visualization accurately represent the sequence of actions taken from the initial state. The action helps in achieving the goal state by moving pieces downward, clearing the top rows.
Expanding state 68
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 76
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 76
successfully verified the action of new state 76 with the path: The last action `move_l_down(rightl0, f3-2f, f4-2f, f4-3f, f5-2f, f5-3f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action logically moves the piece closer to achieving the goal state by clearing the top three rows. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 77
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violation: f4-3f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 77 is invalid: Precondition violation: f4-3f is not clear.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 78
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violated: f4-3f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 78 is invalid: Precondition violated: f4-3f is not clear.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 79
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square1 incorrectly overlaps with square0 in the child state.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square1's position is not updated correctly due to overlap.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: 
[Attempt 4] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: Overlap issue: square0 and square1 cannot occupy the same position f3-0f.
[Attempt 5] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Overlap occurs as f3-0f is not clear, violating preconditions.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 79 is invalid: Overlap occurs as f3-0f is not clear, violating preconditions.
Expanding state 64
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 80
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at position f3-0f.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at position f3-0f.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square1 incorrectly occupies f3-0f along with square0.
[Attempt 4] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at f3-0f.
[Attempt 5] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: f3-0f is not clear; `square0` cannot move there.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 80 is invalid: f3-0f is not clear; `square0` cannot move there.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 81
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: The positions f2-0f and f4-0f are not adjacent, violating the precondition for adjacency.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 81 is invalid: The positions f2-0f and f4-0f are not adjacent, violating the precondition for adjacency.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 82
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 overlap at position f3-0f.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square1 is incorrectly positioned in the child state.
[Attempt 3] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: square0 and square1 cannot occupy the same position f3-0f.
[Attempt 4] Generating diagram encoding
Encoding invalid: Overlap of square0 and square1 at f3-0f.
[Attempt 5] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: The precondition that f3-0f must be clear is violated, and the action does not clear any additional positions in the top three rows.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 82 is invalid: The precondition that f3-0f must be clear is violated, and the action does not clear any additional positions in the top three rows.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 83
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: f2-0f and f4-0f are not adjacent.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 83 is invalid: f2-0f and f4-0f are not adjacent.
Expanding state 67
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 84
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 84
successfully verified the action of new state 84 with the path: The last action `move_two(straight0, f2-1f, f3-1f, f4-1f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied in the parent state, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The action logically moves the piece towards achieving the goal state by clearing the top rows. The current state's natural language description and visualization are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 85
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: Precondition violated: f5-2f is not clear.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 85 is invalid: Precondition violated: f5-2f is not clear.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 9 (4) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 9
Found goal!!
['move_l_down(rightl0, f2-2f, f3-2f, f3-3f, f4-2f, f4-3f)', 'move_square(square1, f2-0f, f3-0f)', 'move_square(square0, f1-0f, f2-0f)', 'move_two(straight0, f0-1f, f1-1f, f2-1f)', 'move_two(straight1, f0-2f, f1-2f, f2-2f)', 'move_two(straight0, f1-1f, f2-1f, f3-1f)', 'move_two(straight1, f2-2f, f3-2f, f4-2f)', 'move_two(straight0, f2-1f, f3-1f, f4-1f)', 'move_square(square0, f2-0f, f3-1f)']
Goal state and path diagrams recorded in <PATH_REMOVED>
(move_l_down f2-2f f3-2f f3-3f f4-2f f4-3f rightl0)
(move_square f2-0f f3-0f square1)
(move_square f1-0f f2-0f square0)
(move_two f0-1f f1-1f f2-1f straight0)
(move_two f0-2f f1-2f f2-2f straight1)
(move_two f1-1f f2-1f f3-1f straight0)
(move_two f2-2f f3-2f f4-2f straight1)
(move_two f2-1f f3-1f f4-1f straight0)
(move_square f2-0f f3-1f square0)
Goal state found.
